Halk Edebiyatı, halkın duygu ve düşüncelerini, özlemlerini, isteklerini dile getiren; sözlü gelenek ürünü, halkın zengin kültür değerlerini yansıtan bir edebiyattır. Halk edebiyatı, özünü, özlüğünü halktan aldığı için halkın edebiyatıdır. Özellikle halkın dünya görüşünü, sanat zevkini, düşünüş ve yaşayış düzenini, bunlarla ilgili gelenek ve görenekleri halk edebiyatında bulabiliriz. Halk edebiyatı, tarihi ve toplumsal kimliği, halkı esas alan dili, muhtevasıyla, Türk halkının milli özünü taşıyan, halkın değerleriyle bütünleşen, ondan kaynaklanan özellikleriyle, halkın en iyi ifade edildiği ve yaşatıldığı bir edebiyattır.

Bu kitapta Türk halk edebiyatının genel çerçevesinin çizilmesi, kaynakları ve bölümlerinin tanıtılmasından sonra birinci bölümde anonim Türk halk edebiyatı tanıtılmış ve türlerinden olan atasözleri, deyimler, bilmeceler, ninniler, alkış kargışlar, tekerlemeler ve halk hikayeleri ve onun önemli bir çeşidi önemli bir çeşidi olan Dede Korkut Hikayeleri üzerinde durulmuştur. Devamında yine anonim Türk halk edebiyatı türlerinden olan halk masallarına geçilmiş, sonrasında bunu efsane, halk fıkraları ve destan türleri sırasıyla izlemiştir. İkinci bölümde ise âşık edebiyatı ile ilgili önemli bilgilerden sonra bu edebiyatın kaynakları, başka edebiyatları etkilemesi ve 16 – 20. yüzyıllar arasındaki âşık edebiyatı genel olarak tanıtılıp önemli temsilcilerine yer verilmiştir. Üçüncü bölümde tasavvuf edebiyatı dil ve üslup özellikleri ile dönemlerine göre bu edebiyatın önemli temsilcilerinden bahsedilmiştir.

From times immemorial, literature has accumulated a large and varied store of all kinds of general ideas and conceptions, material and metaphysical, to which the masters have recourse the moment the over-exacting and over-restless human voice begins to be heard. This is exactly the point. Tchekhov himself, a writer and an educated man, refused in advance every possible consolation, material or metaphysical. Not even in Tolstoi, who set no great store by philosophical systems, will you find such keenly expressed disgust for every kind of conceptions and ideas as in Tchekhov. He is well aware that conceptions ought to be esteemed and respected, and he reckons his inability to bend the knee before that which educated people consider holy as a defect against which he must struggle with all his strength. And he does struggle with all his strength against this defect. But not only is the struggle unavailing; the longer Tchekhov lives, the weaker grows the power of lofty words over him, in spite of his own reason and his conscious will. Finally, he frees himself entirely from ideas of every kind, and loses even the notion of connection between the happenings of life. Herein lies the most important and original characteristic of his creation. Anticipating a little, I would here point to his comedy, The Sea-Gull, where, in defiance of all literary principles, the basis of action appears to be not the logical development of passions, or the inevitable connection between cause and effect, but naked accident, ostentatiously nude. As one reads the play, it seems at times that one has before one a copy of a newspaper with an endless series of news paragraphs, heaped upon one another, without order and without previous plan. Sovereign accident reigns everywhere and in everything, this time boldly throwing the gauntlet to all conceptions. In this, I repeat, is Tchekhov’s greatest originality, and this, strangely enough, is the source of his most bitter experiences. He did not want to be original; he made super-human efforts to be like everybody else: but there is no escaping one’s destiny. How many men, above all among writers, wear their fingers to the bone in the effort to be unlike others, and yet they cannot shake themselves free of cliché—yet Tchekhov was original against his will! Evidently originality does not depend upon the readiness to proclaim revolutionary opinions at all costs. The newest and boldest idea may and often does appear tedious and vulgar. In order to become original, instead of inventing an idea, one must achieve a difficult and painful labour; and, since men avoid labour and suffering, the really new is for the most part born in man against his will.

La morphologie, visant à étudier spécialement la structure interne des mots, se divise traditionnellement en deux branches : morphologie dérivationnelle (ou lexicale), s’intéressant à l’aspect formationnel (dérivationnel) des mots complexes (dérivés ou construits) et morphologie flexionnelle, s’occupant spécifiquement de l’aspect flexionnel. C’est ce deuxième aspect qui est adopté dans cet ouvrage, qui essaie de rendre cette matière quelque peu complexe, même pour un public averti, plus accessible par tous, notamment par les apprenants étrangers, en sélectionnant une méthodologie « distributionnelle ». En effet, les travaux existants en la matière sont purement descriptifs et souvent assez complexes et, par conséquent, ne conviennent guère au public méconnaissant le domaine et encore moins aux étudiants qui tâchent d’appréhender le fonctionnement morphologique d’une langue étrangère.

Il s’agit, donc, d’un ouvrage d’initiation, de nature pédagogique, spécialement conçu pour l’enseignement et l’apprentissage de la morphologie du français. Ainsi, tout en apprenant les techniques d’analyses morphologiques, ces derniers saisiront plus facilement les fondements de la flexion des mots français. D’où, l’autre caractéristique de l’ouvrage, qui se veut, autant que possible, d’une simplicité, aussi bien sur les plans du contenu, du corpus, de la méthode d’analyse et de la description qu’au niveau métalinguistique.