Action research, colloquially referred to as ‘teacher research’ in academic discourse, represents a research paradigm that has been prominently adopted in the field of education and is gradually gaining traction in Turkish academic research. The present research systematically examines postgraduate action research conducted in the Turkish educational field in recent years, including considerations of subject matter, technical characteristics, and resulting outcomes. The last part of this scholarly work outlines a participatory action research framework in line with the established characteristics elucidated in the scholarly literature. The overall aim of this literary contribution is to provide a valuable resource for educators engaged in the intricacies of action research, postgraduate students, experts within the educational sciences, and diligent researchers, thereby fostering an enriched academic discourse.

Bilgi ve iletişim teknolojilerinde hızla meydana gelen gelişmeler, bireylerin gündelik yaşamında önemli bir yer edinmiş, bu durum vatandaşlık biçimlerine yeni bir soluk kazandırmıştır. Yaygınlaşan dijital teknolojilerin artan kullanımı ile birlikte her birey adeta dijital dünyanın vatandaşı konumuna gelmiştir. Bu durum yeni etkileşim biçimleri ve sorumlulukları da beraberinde getirmiştir. Dijital vatandaşlık eğitimi bu bakımdan her geçen gün önemi daha fazla artan bir ihtiyaç haline gelmiştir. İşte bu kitap, iyi bir dijital vatandaş yetiştirmede kullanılacak bir başvuru eseri olması amacıyla hazırlanmıştır. İçerisinde bölümler olarak sunulan oturumlar her bir dijital vatandaşlık boyutunu okuyucuya kazandırarak, neticesinde de iyi dijital vatandaşlar olmanın anahtarını sunmaktadır.

In undertaking to treat of Aristotle as the expounder of ancient educational ideas, I might, with Kapp’s Aristoteles’ Staatspaedagogik before me, have made my task an easy one. I might simply have presented in an orderly way and with a little commentary, what is to be found on the subject of education in his various works—Politics, Ethics, Rhetoric, Poetics, etc. I had two reasons, however, for not adopting this course: (1) that this work had been done, better than I could do it, in the treatise referred to, and (2) that a mere restatement of what Aristotle says on education would hardly have shown his relation to ancient pedagogy as a whole. I therefore judged it better, by tracing briefly the whole history of Greek education up to Aristotle and down from Aristotle, to show the past which conditioned his theories and the future which was conditioned by them. Only thus, it seemed to me, could his teachings be seen in their proper light. And I have found that this method has many advantages, of which I may mention one. It has enabled me to show the close connection that existed at all times between Greek education and Greek social and political life, and to present the one as the reflection of the other. And this is no small advantage, since it is just from its relation to the whole of life that Greek education derives its chief interest for us. We can never, indeed, return to the purely political education of the Greeks; they themselves had to abandon that, and, since then,

A boundless hope has passed across the earth—

a hope which gives our education a meaning and a scope far wider than any that the State aims at; but in these days, when the State and the institution which embodies that hope are contending for the right to educate, it cannot but aid us in settling their respective claims, to follow the process by which they came to have distinct claims at all, and to see just what these mean. This process, the method which I have followed has, I hope, enabled me, in some degree, to bring into clearness. This, at all events, has been one of my chief aims.

…

THOMAS DAVIDSON

“Glenmore,”

Keene, Essex Co., N.Y.

October, 1891.