The determinants of local government performance have long been of interest, and have been empirically investigated in a number of recent studies. A general question in this area is: why have some local governments across the countries achieved high rates of performance whilst the others remained at lower levels? Evidence from the relevant literature indicates that some local governments or municipalities, particularly in developed countries, achieve very good performance. Others, in particular those from underdeveloped or developing, have very little or almost no performance.

This research empirically investigates the budgeting conditions in North Cyprus and evaluate how budgeting conditions vary from one municipality to the other in the five major municipalities; Lefkosa, Magusa, Girne, Guzelyurt and Iskele over the period 2004Q1 to 2012Q4. Two types of methodologies are conducted. First; it empirically investigates the determinants of local government deficit by using cointegration techniques. The Johansen co-integration and The Vector Error Correction model (VECM) are applied to test the effect of each element such as own-source revenue, grants, expenditures and debt services on the budget deficit. Second, the study test the convergence hypothesis if similar regions within the country converge to the same long-run steady state by considering five major Cypriot municipalities in the North Cyprus economy.

The results from the empirical analysis on budget deficit findings show that there is evidence of a long-run relationship between general deficit and its determinants. The evidence of causality is found from expenditure and debt to general deficit for Lefkosa municipality. There is unidirectional causality from grant and revenue through deficit for Magusa municipality. Third empirical analysis on convergence introduced that the municipalities with the lowest number of people per staff, commonly diverge from the group mean.

Bu kitap, Avrupa ve Asya ülkesi olması bakımından özgün bir öneme sahip olan Türkiye’nin, hem Avrasya hem de Avrupa alanlarında oluşan ekonomik entegrasyonlara dahil olmasının AB üyelik süreçlerine bir engel ya da tehdit oluşturmadığını, bunun eksen kayması değil aksine bölgesel ve uluslararası barışa katkı sağlayacağını savunuyor. Türkiye Avrupa ve Avrasya’yı ayıran bir köprü olmaktan daha fazlasıdır. Bu yüzden, Türkiye’nin Avrasya ülkesi olma özgünlüğünü kullanarak, bölgesel ekonomik entegrasyonlara katılımının mümkün hatta zorunlu olduğunu vurgulamaktadır. Bu savını; Uluslararası Sistemin Tarafları, Batı’dan Doğu’ya Küresel Güç Kayması, Ekonomik Büyümenin Tarihi, Küresel Güç Kayması ve Türkiye, Avrasya’da Yeni Ekonomik Entegrasyonlar, Avrasya ve Türkiye’nin Politik Ekonomileri vb. ana başlıkları altında açıklamaktadır.

During the 19th century, British diplomacy towards the Ottoman Empire was based on rejuvenating and revitalising the administration system with a series of social and political reforms. Although British attitudes began to transform during the Near Eastern Crisis of 1876-8 and the Anglo-Ottoman alliance was interrupted, the policy changed dramatically on the eve of the First World War.Nonetheless, major events such as the Chanak Crisis in the British Cabinet, the occupation of Constantinople and Smyrna and finally the Turkish Nationalist Movementunder the leadership of Mustafa Kemal Ataturk effected the dynamics of Anglo-Ottoman relations. This book examines the ground of these policies and analyses how thisstorm was over in British foreign policies towards Turkey between 1918 and 1923.