Although the month is March and not November, it is never unseasonable to count up the blessings for which it is well to be thankful. In fact, from the standpoint of education, the spring is perhaps the appropriate time to perform this very pleasant function. As if still further to emphasize the fact that education, like civilization, is an artificial thing, we have reversed the operations of Mother Nature: we sow our seed in the fall and cultivate our crops during the winter and reap our harvests in the spring. I may be pardoned, therefore, for making the theme of my discussion a brief review of the elements of growth and victory for which the educator of to-day may justly be grateful, with, perhaps, a few suggestions of what the next few years may reasonably be expected to bring forth.

And this course is all the more necessary because, I believe, the teaching profession is unduly prone to pessimism. One might think at first glance that the contrary would be true. We are surrounded on every side by youth. Youth is the material with which we constantly deal. Youth is buoyant, hopeful, exuberant; and yet, with this material constantly surrounding us, we frequently find the task wearisome and apparently hopeless. The reason is not far to seek. Youth is not only buoyant, it is unsophisticated, it is inexperienced, in many important particulars it is crude. Some of its tastes must necessarily, in our judgment, hark back to the primitive, to the barbaric. Ours is continually the task to civilize, to sophisticate, to refine this raw material. But, unfortunately for us, the effort that we put forth does not always bring results that we can see and weigh and measure. The hopefulness of our material is overshadowed not infrequently by its crudeness. We take each generation as it comes to us. We strive to lift it to the plane that civilized society has reached. We do our best and pass it on, mindful of the many inadequacies, perhaps of the many failures, in our work. We turn to the new generation that takes its place. We hope for better materials, but we find no improvement.

Bu çalışmanın amacı, okul öncesi eğitimi alan öğretmen adaylarının sürdürülebilir yaşama yönelik farkındalıklarının belirlenmesinde çevre eğitimi aracı olarak kullanılan ekolojik ayak izi uygulamalarının etkisini incelemektir Yapılan analizlerden elde edilen sonuçlar şunlardır: Öğretmen adaylarının sürdürülebilir yaşama yönelik farkındalık puanlarının hesabı ve ekolojik ayak izi hesaplamalarının uygulaması sonucunda,  Türkiye’nin ekolojik ayak izi raporunda ortaya çıkan ortalama ekolojik ayak izinin öğretmen adaylarının testleri sonucu ortaya çıkan ekolojik ayak izinden daha düşük olduğu görülmüştür. Yani çevreye bıraktıkları iz Türk toplumuna göre daha küçüktür. Ekolojik ayak izi hesaplamaları sonucunda öğretmen adaylarının ekolojik ayak izine etkiyi en çok mallar ve hizmetler alanı yaparken en az seyahat alanının katkıda bulunduğu görülmüştür. Okul öncesi kız öğretmen adaylarının erkek öğretmen adaylarına göre ekolojik ayak izleri daha küçüktür.

Bu nedenle çevre eğitimi ders programlarının ve dersin işlenişi gözden geçirilmelidir önerisinde bulunulmuştur. Ayrıca okul öncesi öğretmen adaylarının ekolojik ayak izleri erkek adaylara göre daha küçük olduğu, erkek öğrencilere yönelik etkinliklere çevre eğitiminde daha çok yer verilmesi gerekliği önerisinde bulunulmuştur.

The Herbart school adheres to this view of education, and has transferred its spirit and method to the schools. The Herbartians have the hardihood, in this age of moral skeptics, to believe not only in moral example but also in moral teaching. (By moral skeptics we mean those who believe in morals but not in moral instruction.) They seek first of all historical materials of the richest moral content, in vivid personification, upon which to nourish the moral spirit of children. If properly treated, this subject matter will soon win the children by its power over feeling and judgment. With Crusoe the child goes through every hardship and success; with Abraham he lives in tents, seeks pastures for his flocks, and generously marches out to the rescue of his kinsmen. He should not read Caesar with a slow and toilsome drag (parsing and construing) that would render a bright boy stupid. If he goes with Caesar at all, he must build an agger, fight battles, construct bridges, and approve or condemn Caesar’s acts. But we doubt the moral value of Caesar’s Gallic wars. By reading Plutarch we may see that the Latins and Greeks, before the days of their degeneracy, nourished their rising youth upon the traditions of their ancestry. The education produced a tough and sinewy brood of moral qualities.