Osmanlı döneminde Girit üç sancağa ayrılmıştır: Hanya, Kandiye, Resmo.

Girit’in tamamının fethedildiği 1669’dan zamandan beri siyasî ve sosyal hayatımızda olduğu gibi edebî hayatımızda da önemli bir yeri olmuştur. Osmanlı şehirlerinde cami, tekke ve medreseler Osmanlı kültürünün temelini oluşturmaktadır. Girit’te de edebî ve kültürel ortamı cami, medrese ve tekkeler şekillendirmiştir.  Bunun neticesi olarak Girit’te şair sayısı hızla artmış, zengin bir edebî ve kültürel ortam oluşmuştur.

Yaklaşık 250 yıl Osmanlı-Türk hâkimiyetinde kalan Girit’in bu kadar zaman içerisinde çok şair yetiştirmesinden dolayı bir şiir adası olarak değerlendirilmiştir.

Kâmî, Girit’in Hanya sancağında yaşamış, döneminin medrese ilimlerini tahsil etmiş, uzun yıllar Suda kalesinde gümrük kâtipliği yapmıştır. 1217/1802 tarihinde İstanbul’a göç etmiş, altı ay sonra İstanbul’da vefat etmiştir.

Hanyalı Kâmî,  Adalar, Girit ve Hanya’daki Türk kültürü, edebiyatı ve sosyal hayatı için önemli bir şairdir.

The author has dwelt, especially in the theoretical part, upon general questions which are side-issues in respect to the theme that he has treated. But this will not seem a digression to those who remember that, strictly speaking, there are no particular philosophical sciences, standing by themselves. Philosophy is unity, and when we treat of Æsthetic or of Logic or of Ethics, we treat always of the whole of philosophy, although illustrating for didactic purposes only one side of that inseparable unity. In like manner, owing to this intimate connexion of all the parts of philosophy, the uncertainty and misunderstanding as to the æsthetic activity, the representative and productive imagination, this firstborn of the spiritual activities, mainstay of the others, generates everywhere else misunderstandings, uncertainties and errors: in Psychology as in Logic, in History as in the Philosophy of Practice. If language is the first spiritual manifestation, and if the æsthetic form is language itself, taken in all its true scientific extension, it is hopeless to try to understand clearly the later and more complicated phases of the life of the spirit, when their first and simplest moment is ill known, mutilated and disfigured. From the explanation of the æsthetic activity is also to be expected the correction of several concepts and the solution of certain philosophic problems which generally seem to be almost desperate. Such is precisely the spirit animating the present work. And if the present attempt and the historical illustrations which accompany it may be of use in winning friends to these studies, by levelling obstacles and indicating paths to be followed; if this happen, especially here in Italy, whose æsthetic traditions (as has been demonstrated in its place) are very noble, the author will consider that he has gained his end, and one of his keenest desires will have been satisfied.