Globalization and related technological developments have increased competition and put organizations in a struggle to survive in an extremely difficult market condition. Organizations adopt their technologies and infrastructures to today’s conditions to gain a sustainable competitive advantage and maintain their existence. However, all these efforts of organizations are easily imitated by rival companies and may cause the loss of competitive advantage.

The resource-based view provides additional information that strategic human resource is the scarce, valuable, inimitable and non-substitutable resources of organizations, thus enabling them to gain a competitive advantage. According to this view, the competitive advantage of the organization is achieved by combining valuable internal resources. Nowadays, sustainable competitive advantage is provided not by environmental factors or physical capital but by human capital (employees) efficiency. In this context, the attitudes and behaviors of employees who make up human resources are important for their organizational success. Many studies emphasize that positive attitudes and behaviors (e.g. innovative work behavior, work engagement, job satisfaction) in employees have important contributions to the success of the organization, while similarly negative attitudes and behaviors (e.g. organizational silence, turnover intention) are one of the main reasons for the failure of the organization.

In our book, literature has been created on the definition, antecedents, and organizational results of new and current concepts that are newly conceptualized in the literature and are still in their infancy. It is considered that this cumulative literature within the book will be a source for future studies on these subjects and will provide important insights for practitioners.

Adam Smith, with “An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations” published in 1776 is unanimously hailed as the founder of economics as a social science and also of “economic liberalism” or “capitalism” as it is called to contrast it with “socialism”, the latter propagated by K. Marx at a later date.

The group of economists that followed A.Smith, including such notable names as D.Ricardo, N.W.Senior, John Stuart Mill, culminating in Alfred Marshall (1890: Principles of Economics) is called the “Classical School” or alternately the “Manchester School” to refer to their place of origin. Their macroeconomic system is called the “Classical System”. Having accepted the Malthusian law of population (T.Robert Malthus: 1798 Essays on the Principle of Population) D. Ricardo had come up with a model in which growth eventually comes to a halt, moving to that point, however, all along at full employment equilibrium.This was also in line with the views of Adam Smith. Marshall had introduced the concept of elasticities and used the partial method of analysis. In contrast, Leon Walras, in his “Eléments d’Economie Pure ou Theorie de La Richesse Sociale” used the general equilibrium approach to prove that the economy arrives automatically to full employment equilibrium, following Adam Smith and the Classical School.

This book offers a summary of the basic views and conclusions of Adam Smith concerning economic regime, as is also followed by the rest of the members of the Classical School: In a milieu of perfect competition prevailing in all the markets or sectors of the economy, including the labor market, full employment equilibrium will be achieved automatically. This equilibrium will, therefore, also maximize the welfare of the workers because the market wage rate, with no intrusions from the government or the unions, will have ensured full employment. Hence, there is no need for interventionism, that is, for the state to intervene prices, wages, channeling of investments and economic decisions in general.

Aile işletmelerinin birçok boyuttan incelediği bir serinin parçası olan bu kitap, aile işletmelerinde liderlik ve aile ilişkilerine odaklanmıştır. Aile üyeleri gerek kurucu, gerek yönetici gerekse de çalışan bazen de sadece hissedar olarak işletmede önemli rol oynamaktadır. Bu önemine karşın aile işletmeleri ile ilgili yazın incelendiğinde aile boyutunun önemli ölçüde ihmal edildiği görülmektedir.

Ailenin sahip olduğu birlik beraberlik anlayışı nedeniyle aile ilişkileri hakkında bilgi verilmekten çekinmesi aile ilişkilerinin incelenmesini güçleştirmekte ve araştırmacıların aile boyutunu ihmal ederek işletme boyutuna odaklanmasına neden olmaktadır. İhmal edilen aile boyutu ise kendini aile üyeleri arasındaki güç ve liderlik mücadelelerinde göstermekte ve işletmenin ömrünü kısaltan en önemli faktörlerden biri olarak karşımıza çıkmaktadır.

Bu nedenlerden dolayı, bu kitap öncelikle aile işletmelerinde güç ve liderlik konularını incelemeye odaklanmıştır. Ayrıca aile işletmesine aile üyelerinin gözünden de bakmaktadır. Bu alanlardaki sorunlar tespit edildikten sonra devir süreci ve ailenin kurumsallaşması süreçlerini açıklayarak, aile işletmelerinin sürdürülebilirlik sorunlarına çözüm önerileri sunmayı amaçlanmaktadır.