The aim of this book is to shed light on dystopia within the circle of twentieth century literature by analysing the development of totalitarianism and its detrimental effects, such as dehumanisation and social unrest that shattered the unity of society in three basic forms as reflected in William Golding’s Lord of the Flies (1953), George Orwell’s Animal Farm (1945) and Nineteen Eighty-Four (1949). Thus, it explores the beginning of totalitarianism resulted from an inborn instinctive drive as reflected in William Golding’s Lord of the Flies (1953) first, then its formation and rise in George Orwell’s Animal Farm (1945), then finally the ill effects of it in both society and in individuals in Nineteen Eighty-Four (1949). Totalitarianism, together with “Fascism”, in the twentieth century can be confined to the period between 1922 and 1975. It starts with Mussolini; is followed by Hitler and Stalin, then ends with the death of Franco. It was during the rule of totalitarians that all ideals promising peace were abused to claim the rule, terror and fear factors were resorted to secure a totalitarian power at the expense of millions of deaths, torture and social unrest. In these novels, William Golding and George Orwell criticise how totalitarianism is established, and maintained by fear, manipulation and terror in the twentieth century.

Toplumların sahip oldukları edebi zenginliklerin önemli bir kısmı sözlü kültür geleneğine ve bu geleneğin kendi içinde barındırdığı sözlü kültür unsurlarına dayanmaktadır. Bu yüzden,  nesilden nesile şifahi olarak aktarılan bu sözlü kültür unsurlarının tedvin edilerek korunmaları büyük bir önem arz etmektedir.

Türkiye’de Arapçanın konuşulduğu ve sözlü kültür geleneğinin önemli bir yer tuttuğu şehirlerden biri de Mardin’dir. Çok dilliliğin ve çok kültürlülüğün hâkim olduğu bu şehirde,  anadili Arapça olanlar kendi dillerini yazılı kültürden yoksun bir şekilde tamamen sözlü geleneğe bağlı bir şekilde yüzyıllar boyunca muhafaza etmişlerdir. Bu bölgeye ait sözlü kültür,  aynı zamanda burada yaşayan halka ait dilsel ve kültürel kodları da içinde barındırmaktadır.

Bu eserde,  Mardin Arapça sözlü kültürüne ait dilsel ve kültürel unsurlara yer verilmiş,  sözlü kültür araştırmacıları tarafından on iki farklı başlık altında hikâye,  atasözü,  mani,  ninni,  ağıt,  tekerleme vb. sözlü kültür unsurlarına,  bunun yanında Mardin Arapça diyalektine ait dilsel ve kültürel özelliklere de yer verilmiştir. Bu yönüyle eser,  Arapça sözlü kültür alanında çalışan araştırmacı ve akademisyenler için temel kaynaklardan biri olacaktır.

“Originally published in 1896.”

In the following pages my aim has been to sketch the development of criticism, and particularly of critical method, in England; and to illustrate each phase of its growth by one or two samples taken from the most typical writers. I have in no way attempted to make a full collection of what might be thought the most striking pieces of criticism to be found in our literature.

Owing to the great wealth of such writing produced during the last sixty years, it is clearly impossible to give so complete a picture of what has been done in this period as in others. I am obliged to content myself with one specimen of one writer. But that is the writer who, in the opinion of many, is the most remarkable of all English critics. For the permission, so kindly granted, to include the Essay on Sandro Botticelli I desire to offer my sincerest thanks to Messrs. Macmillan and to the other representatives of the late Mr. Pater.

It may seem strange to close a volume of literary criticism with a study on the work and temperament of a painter. I have been led to do so for more than one reason. A noticeable tendency of modern criticism, from the time of Burke and Lessing, has been to break down the barrier between poetry and the kindred arts; and it is perhaps well that this tendency should find expression in the following selection. But a further reason is that Mr. Pater was never so much himself, was never so entirely master of his craft, as when interpreting the secrets of form and colour. Most of all was this the case when he had chosen for his theme one who, like Botticelli, “is before all things a poetical painter”.

1. E. VAUGHAN

February, 1896.